Re: OT: Caching synchronous writes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Ross Walker wrote:
> 
> NFS should always be 'sync' if performance isn't good, then your  
> storage isn't good.

Why demand sync on remote storage when you typically don't have it locally? 
Programs that need transactional integrity should know when to fsync() and for 
anything else there's not much difference whether you crash before or after a 
write() was issued in terms of it not completing.

-- 
   Les Mikesesll
    lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux