Ray Van Dolson wrote: > The "delayed allocation" features in ext4 (and xfs, reiser4) sound > interesting. Might give a little performance boost for synchronous > write workloads.... Doesn't delayed allocation defeat the purpose of a synchronous write? I think what you want is a proper storage array with mirrored write cache. nate _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos