Re: NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]





On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Geoff Galitz <geoff@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The CIFS mounts can't be unmounted without a reboot,

> so they build-up a pool of mounts to the same server which cause extra latency

 

Is there an environmental restriction in your application or organization for this?  Normally CIFS mounts can umounted easily in runtime.


what do you mean by this?

 

At any rate... if I were in your shoes and really restricted to the options you propose, I would go with CIFS mounts through IPSEC tunnels.   

 


Wouldn't IPSEC add more  overhead than an SSH tunnel?
 

-geoff

 

---------------------------------
Geoff Galitz
Blankenheim NRW, Germany
http://www.galitz.org/
http://german-way.com/blog/


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




--
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
SoftDux

Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com
Office: 087 805 9573
Cell: 082 554 7532
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux