> There are concerns that everyone's currently fast performing LVM file > systems will suddenly become doggish once barrier support is included > and in some cases it will be true. Using a separate SSD device as a > journal can help in some cases. > That's only if you are using ext3/ext4 and data=journal. Are SSDs faster than bbu nvram cards? _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways
- From: Christopher Chan <christopher.chan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 08:25:20 +0800
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <F6B57CE6-9BF1-44BD-B1F4-6497AAF1816C@xxxxxxxxx>
- References: <667c2e1e1001240909l5a12a8d6t7a2bdbca05426975@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <667c2e1e1001250341x142146d4kbba677b099e4e06c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <22210861-2774-411B-AE9A-5183F4822809@xxxxxxxxx> <1264461770.15624.13.camel@ethies> <A617EF2B-CBE1-42E8-86C5-7BCAB250BDD3@xxxxxxxxx> <1264464128.15624.20.camel@ethies> <FDA4D683-DDBA-4DA8-AB3A-9BA6DAF9796F@xxxxxxxxx> <667c2e1e1001270111m77b1b5f3ud2ddf77a2af4b052@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B6031E5.7060706@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1C349798-7B0F-4090-B7D9-ABA72C2F2AA3@xxxxxxxxx> <667c2e1e1001270720k77d8bd58s46e3877881a42d96@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6D524E5A-714E-4164-9CFC-D753DCFA2A61@xxxxxxxxx> <4B60DF48.4050906@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5BE48A20-AFB7-4154-A5CD-B77514FB6B51@xxxxxxxxx> <4B61B8C3.4080703@xxxxxxxxx> <50361.10.10.10.51.1264696636.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6B172C18-6B0E-46D0-9D80-BF9051E4BA27@xxxxxxxxx> <2160.65.102.144.193.1264723114.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <F6B57CE6-9BF1-44BD-B1F4-6497AAF1816C@xxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8pre) Gecko/20100126 Shredder/3.0.2pre
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways
- From: Ross Walker
- Re: Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways
- References:
- Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways
- From: Noob Centos Admin
- Re: Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways
- From: Noob Centos Admin
- Re: Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways
- From: Ross Walker
- Re: Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways
- From: JohnS
- Re: Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways
- From: Ross Walker
- Re: Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways
- From: JohnS
- Re: Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways
- From: Ross Walker
- Re: Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways
- From: Noob Centos Admin
- Re: Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways
- From: Chan Chung Hang Christopher
- Re: Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways
- From: Ross Walker
- Re: Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways
- From: Noob Centos Admin
- Re: Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways
- From: Ross Walker
- Re: Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways
- From: Christopher Chan
- Re: Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways
- From: Ross Walker
- Re: Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways
- From: nate
- Re: Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways
- From: Ross Walker
- Re: Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways
- From: nate
- Re: Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways
- From: Ross Walker
- Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways
- Prev by Date: Re: How to map ata#.# numbers to /dev/sd numbers?
- Next by Date: Re: Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways
- Previous by thread: Re: Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways
- Next by thread: Re: Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways
- Index(es):
 |