Re: Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Hi,

On 1/27/10, Ross Walker <rswwalker@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> But if your doing mysql on top of LVM your basically doing the same,
> cause LVM (other then current kernels) doesn't support barriers.
>
> Still if you have a battery backed write-caching controller that
> negates the fsync risk, LVM or not, mysql or postgresql.

This is a bit of a surpise. Am I understanding correctly that running
postgresql or mysql on top of LVM negates any data reliability
measures the DBMS might have in the event of an unexpected shutdown?

I have several servers configured to run LVM on top of MD1 for the
convenience of being able to add more space to a volume in the future.
I didn't realize this was a reliability risk. :(
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux