Rudi Ahlers wrote: > let's keep the question simple. WHICH filesystem would be best for this type > of operation? SMB, NFS, or iSCSI? none nate _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- From: "nate" <centos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:04:58 -0800 (PST)
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <695200da1001281430h300d1e17r739dd945f31e9917@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <695200da1001280328i5e9a48bficd085a44ea20fdda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47553.10.10.10.51.1264687442.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <695200da1001281313p34f3b346h40abb2c3dd277452@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B6202FB.1080804@xxxxxxxxx> <695200da1001281430h300d1e17r739dd945f31e9917@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.9a
- References:
- NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- From: Rudi Ahlers
- Re: NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- From: nate
- Re: NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- From: Rudi Ahlers
- Re: NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- From: Rudi Ahlers
- NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Prev by Date: Re: Adobe Acrobat Reader 9.3 - slightly OT
- Next by Date: Re: NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Previous by thread: Re: NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Next by thread: Re: NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
- Index(es):
 |