On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 14:55 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:44 PM, JohnS <jses27@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 17:13 -0500, Ron Loftin wrote: > > > Also I have a problem with your post, heres why: The same for CentOS and > > RHEL 5. > > > > uname -ra > > Linux ethies 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 15 21:04:57 EST 2009 i686 > > i686 i386 GNU/Linux > > # > > # Serial drivers > > # > > CONFIG_SERIAL_8250=y > > CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE=y > > CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_PCI=y > > CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_PNP=y > > CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CS=m > > CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_NR_UARTS=32 > > CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_RUNTIME_UARTS=4 > > CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_EXTENDED=y > > CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_MANY_PORTS=y > > CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_SHARE_IRQ=y > > CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_DETECT_IRQ=y > > CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_RSA=y > > > > That can not be a """5""" Kernel you listed > > John > > In the original post, the list for 4.8 and the one for 5.4 were swapped. :) > > Akemi --- LOL why yall do me like that... :-) John _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos