Re: Serial port fun: CentOS 4.8 (32-bit) vs. CentOS 5.4 (64-bit)

[Akemi Yagi <amyagi@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:44 PM, JohnS <jses27@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 17:13 -0500, Ron Loftin wrote:

> Also I have a problem with your post, heres why: The same for CentOS and
> RHEL 5.
>
> uname -ra
> Linux ethies 2.6.18-164.9.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 15 21:04:57 EST 2009 i686
> i686 i386 GNU/Linux
> #
> # Serial drivers
> #
> CONFIG_SERIAL_8250=y
> CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE=y
> CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_PCI=y
> CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_PNP=y
> CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_CS=m
> CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_NR_UARTS=32
> CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_RUNTIME_UARTS=4
> CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_EXTENDED=y
> CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_MANY_PORTS=y
> CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_SHARE_IRQ=y
> CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_DETECT_IRQ=y
> CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_RSA=y
>
> That can not be a """5""" Kernel you listed
> John

In the original post, the list for 4.8 and the one for 5.4 were swapped.  :)

Akemi
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos