Re: The future is here, but Spamassassin doesn't buy it

[Fabian Arrotin <fabian.arrotin@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Gilbert Sebenste wrote on Fri, 1 Jan 2010 13:52:03 -0600 (CST):
> 
>> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.2 required=5.0 tests=FH_DATE_PAST_20XX,
>>      SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no version=3.2.5
>> X-Spam-Report:
>>      *  3.4 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX The date is grossly in the future.
> 
> add
> 
> score FH_DATE_PAST_20XX 0
> 
> to your /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
> And you should use Bayes. A well-trained Bayes would have balanced that 
> down (assuming it was ham).
> 
> Kai

  *nod* : my spamassasin machine didn't block any mail today (except 
real spam) thanks to bayes. The FH_DATE_PAST_20XX scored up but bayes 
scored down on the other hand so no False Positive here ;-)

-- 
--
Fabian Arrotin
test -e /dev/human/brain || ( echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq ; echo c > 
/proc/sysrq-trigger )



_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos