Gilbert Sebenste wrote on Fri, 1 Jan 2010 13:52:03 -0600 (CST): > X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.2 required=5.0 tests=FH_DATE_PAST_20XX, > SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no version=3.2.5 > X-Spam-Report: > * 3.4 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX The date is grossly in the future. add score FH_DATE_PAST_20XX 0 to your /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf And you should use Bayes. A well-trained Bayes would have balanced that down (assuming it was ham). Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: The future is here, but Spamassassin doesn't buy it
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: The future is here, but Spamassassin doesn't buy it
- From: Kai Schaetzl <maillists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 22:02:36 +0100
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1001011350240.30666@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1001011350240.30666@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The future is here, but Spamassassin doesn't buy it
- From: Fabian Arrotin
- Re: The future is here, but Spamassassin doesn't buy it
- References:
- The future is here, but Spamassassin doesn't buy it
- From: Gilbert Sebenste
- The future is here, but Spamassassin doesn't buy it
- Prev by Date: Re: one server handled sendmail added two more servers messes things up
- Next by Date: Re: The future is here, but Spamassassin doesn't buy it
- Previous by thread: Re: The future is here, but Spamassassin doesn't buy it
- Next by thread: Re: The future is here, but Spamassassin doesn't buy it
- Index(es):
 |