Re: NTFS and elrepo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Ron Loftin <reloftin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 15:20 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:

>> Something is wrong here.  You are missing
>> /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.el5/extra/ntfs/ntfs.ko that the symlinks are
>> pointing to.  Are those symlinks red-blinking?
>
> It's there.  I must have missed it with my cut-and-paste before.
>
> ( Side note:  I can't stand all that color-coding with the "ls" command,
> so I disable it.  That's just my prejudice from growing up with UNIX in
> the '80s and '90s on REAL monochrome terminals. ;)

I fully understand (similar generation?!).

> ls -l /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.el5/extra/ntfs/ntfs.ko
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 235684 Oct  9
> 13:00 /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.el5/extra/ntfs/ntfs.ko

Alright. Then as far as installation of the modules are concerned,
there does not seem to be a problem.  So, just for a confirmation,
'modprobe ntfs' and 'modprobe fuse' run without any errors and lsmod
shows both modules loaded?

If ntfs-3g is working for you, I would expect the ntfs module from
kmod-ntfs works, too.  However, they are not the same.  The latter was
built from the ntfs code in CentOS 5.3 (which was originally broken).
I believe it worked after a patch was applied and this was tested by
CentOS QA members.

Akemi
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux