On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 15:20 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Ron Loftin <reloftin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 14:49 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
> >> Could you show us the output returned by:
> >>
> >> uname -mr
> >> ls -l `find /lib/modules -name ntfs.ko`
> >> ls -l `find /lib/modules -name fuse.ko`
>
> > uname -mr
> > 2.6.18-164.2.1.el5 i686
> >
> > ls -l `find /lib/modules -name ntfs.ko`
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 46 Oct 31
> > 19:45 /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.2.1.el5/weak-updates/ntfs/ntfs.ko
> > -> /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.el5/extra/ntfs/ntfs.ko
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 46 Oct 31
> > 19:45 /lib/modules/2.6.18-92.1.13.el5/weak-updates/ntfs/ntfs.ko
> > -> /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.el5/extra/ntfs/ntfs.ko
>
> Something is wrong here. You are missing
> /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.el5/extra/ntfs/ntfs.ko that the symlinks are
> pointing to. Are those symlinks red-blinking?
It's there. I must have missed it with my cut-and-paste before.
( Side note: I can't stand all that color-coding with the "ls" command,
so I disable it. That's just my prejudice from growing up with UNIX in
the '80s and '90s on REAL monochrome terminals. ;)
ls -l /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.el5/extra/ntfs/ntfs.ko
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 235684 Oct 9
13:00 /lib/modules/2.6.18-128.el5/extra/ntfs/ntfs.ko
>
> > ls -l `find /lib/modules -name fuse.ko`
> > -rwxr--r-- 1 root root 57464 Sep 30
> > 15:26 /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.2.1.el5/kernel/fs/fuse/fuse.ko
>
> This one is as expected. Just fine.
>
> Akemi
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
--
Ron Loftin reloftin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
"God, root, what is difference ?" Piter from UserFriendly
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
