On 09/16/2009 11:51 PM, Ian Murray wrote: > Should I wait until the rest of the release catches up before trying to resolve this, or should I try now? Should I treat it as a Xen issue or a CentOS issue. I've got about a dozen machines which are running the -164 kernel in the dom0 with about 20 VM's running various kernels under there for i386 and x86_64 with no problems. your problem is most likely caused due to issues in the non CentOS components. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Xen Kernel 2.6.18-164 and Hypervisor 3.3.1 problem.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Xen Kernel 2.6.18-164 and Hypervisor 3.3.1 problem.
- From: Karanbir Singh <mail-lists@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:10:27 +0100
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <412017.337.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <412017.337.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-GB; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20090915 Shredder/3.0b4pre
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Xen Kernel 2.6.18-164 and Hypervisor 3.3.1 problem.
- From: Ian Murray
- Re: Xen Kernel 2.6.18-164 and Hypervisor 3.3.1 problem.
- References:
- Xen Kernel 2.6.18-164 and Hypervisor 3.3.1 problem.
- From: Ian Murray
- Xen Kernel 2.6.18-164 and Hypervisor 3.3.1 problem.
- Prev by Date: pkcs#11, openssl, etc
- Next by Date: Re: [Found] CentOS is dead, long live CentOS
- Previous by thread: Xen Kernel 2.6.18-164 and Hypervisor 3.3.1 problem.
- Next by thread: Re: Xen Kernel 2.6.18-164 and Hypervisor 3.3.1 problem.
- Index(es):
 |