Benjamin Franz wrote: > Ned Slider wrote: >>> >>> >> The "fix" has been available for a long time: >> >> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0440.html >> > > I'm not sure that is the 'fix'. My systems were completely up-to-date as > of last week so I should not have had a problem with that. And yet I did. > $ rpm -q yum-metadata-parser yum-metadata-parser-1.1.2-3.el5 What do you have? CentOS has not release this update. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: BIND vulnerability
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: BIND vulnerability
- From: Ned Slider <ned@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:17:17 +0100
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4A71E0EC.6040004@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <0B07E10AFF88EF38FC543817@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A707A84.9040502@xxxxxxxxxx><4A707FD5.5040507@xxxxxxxxx><5a3c8f450907291029l1be9a5d6o3bcce34769789c8b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A70ACF5.4040105@xxxxxxxxx> <CB97439701BF4C358EE1BFAA78CD8ECC@obiwan2> <4A71CEC2.2010704@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4A71DF8A.2010801@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A71E0EC.6040004@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090605)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: BIND vulnerability
- From: Benjamin Franz
- Re: BIND vulnerability
- References:
- Re: BIND vulnerability
- From: RedShift
- Re: BIND vulnerability
- From: David Hrbáč
- Re: BIND vulnerability
- From: Lucian@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: BIND vulnerability
- From: David Hrbáč
- Re: BIND vulnerability
- From: Bob Hoffman
- Re: BIND vulnerability
- From: Benjamin Franz
- Re: BIND vulnerability
- From: Ned Slider
- Re: BIND vulnerability
- From: Benjamin Franz
- Re: BIND vulnerability
- Prev by Date: Re: Centos convert to rhel?
- Next by Date: Re: BIND vulnerability
- Previous by thread: Re: BIND vulnerability
- Next by thread: Re: BIND vulnerability
- Index(es):
 |