Ned Slider wrote:
> Benjamin Franz wrote:
>
>> Bob Hoffman wrote:
>>
>>> Been watching the bind thing for a few days and waiting for my daily yum to
>>> update.
>>> Finally did it by hand and got an interesting message.
>>>
>>> The python dependency killed my yum...lol. A quick look online and I see a
>>> few thousand fedora and redhat issues with this python thing. Strange that
>>> it is trying to install a package update only to find that package is not
>>> there..... Yeesh
>>>
>>> But was able to run yum update bind and get the issues resolved.
>>>
>>>
>>> --> Running transaction check
>>> ---> Package python.x86_64 0:2.4.3-24.el5_3.6 set to be updated
>>> --> Processing Dependency: /usr/lib64/python2.4 for package: libxslt-python
>>> --> Processing Dependency: /usr/lib64/python2.4 for package: gamin-python
>>> --> Processing Dependency: /usr/lib64/python2.4 for package: libxml2-python
>>> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
>>> libxslt-python-1.1.17-2.el5_2.2.x86_64 from installed has depsolving
>>> problems
>>> --> Missing Dependency: /usr/lib64/python2.4 is needed by package
>>> libxslt-python-1.1.17-2.el5_2.2.x86_64 (installed)
>>> libxml2-python-2.6.26-2.1.2.7.x86_64 from installed has depsolving problems
>>> --> Missing Dependency: /usr/lib64/python2.4 is needed by package
>>> libxml2-python-2.6.26-2.1.2.7.x86_64 (installed)
>>> gamin-python-0.1.7-8.el5.x86_64 from installed has depsolving problems
>>> --> Missing Dependency: /usr/lib64/python2.4 is needed by package
>>> gamin-python-0.1.7-8.el5.x86_64 (installed)
>>> Error: Missing Dependency: /usr/lib64/python2.4 is needed by package
>>> libxslt-python-1.1.17-2.el5_2.2.x86_64 (installed)
>>> Error: Missing Dependency: /usr/lib64/python2.4 is needed by package
>>> libxml2-python-2.6.26-2.1.2.7.x86_64 (installed)
>>> Error: Missing Dependency: /usr/lib64/python2.4 is needed by package
>>> gamin-python-0.1.7-8.el5.x86_64 (installed)
>>>
>>> _
>>>
>> Try doing: yum clean all && yum update
>>
>> That did it for me.
>>
>> Thanks goes to John R. Dennison for the fix.
>>
>>
>
> The "fix" has been available for a long time:
>
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0440.html
>
I'm not sure that is the 'fix'. My systems were completely up-to-date as
of last week so I should not have had a problem with that. And yet I did.
--
Benjamin Franz
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
