On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
I wouould say that you are not
> very serious and ignore your request.
> very serious and ignore your request.
wow, neil ... misunderstand much? i didn't "ask for something to be
changed" so much as i *suggested* a change that might have benefit for
the centos community, and for me in particular that would help me
immensely in being able to promote centos to my clients.
i *cannot* suggest what content should go on that commercial support
page since i have *no idea* what avenues the centos developers are
currently exploring.
seriously, neil, what part of that confuses you? or should i try
again with shorter and simpler words?
rday
p.s. this was my first interaction with the general centos community
and, if this is the level of wilful obduracy i can expect to run into,
it's probably going to be the last.
WOW and GOODBYE..... If you had subscribed to this mailing list, and read it, you would have found that the people participating (including the developers) include some of the most helpful and knowledgeable people on the planet. There is also a Forum on the web. None of the developers make *any* money from the centos project.
More than one RHEL user has come to CentOS because the support here is excellent.
I believe that link did work (recently?) and listed several people who were offering consulting services. There are probably some people on the list who could help your clients, if they have time available.
Those on the list highly recommend our upstream vendor (RHEL) if that would be better suited to your clients. GL
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
