Re: link to "commercial support" page isn't really helpful

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Sun, 21 Jun 2009, Karanbir Singh wrote:

> On 21/06/09 13:28, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >> That page does indeed reflect the current state of play - there is
> >> *no* centos approved or recommended commercial support entity - but
> >> it *is* something that is being worked on.
> >
> >    i realize that page is *technically* correct, but its wording is
> > quite discouraging:
>
> If you want to propose a blob of text that might replace whats on
> the page right now, I am sure we can plumb that in.

  i'm not the right person for that as i am utterly clueless about
what possibilities you're exploring at the moment.  that has to be
done by someone at centos who's involved in it.

rday
--

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                               Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

        Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.

Web page:                                          http://crashcourse.ca
Linked In:                             http://www.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux