On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 10:31 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Sun, 21 Jun 2009, Neil Aggarwal wrote: > > > > i'm not the right person for that > > > > This is strange. You asked for something to be changed. The people > > in charge asked you for a suggestion and now you are putting it back > > on them. If I were in charge of this, I would say that you are not > > very serious and ignore your request. > > wow, neil ... misunderstand much? i didn't "ask for something to be > changed" so much as i *suggested* a change that might have benefit for > the centos community, and for me in particular that would help me > immensely in being able to promote centos to my clients. > > i *cannot* suggest what content should go on that commercial support > page since i have *no idea* what avenues the centos developers are > currently exploring. > > seriously, neil, what part of that confuses you? or should i try > again with shorter and simpler words? > > rday > > p.s. this was my first interaction with the general centos community > and, if this is the level of wilful obduracy i can expect to run into, It's not. > it's probably going to be the last. Snap decision based on incomplete information? Tsk, tsk! ;-) > > -- > > ======================================================================== > Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA > <snip sig stuff> -- Bill _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos