>I have always belived that if you have 5 hard drives 1 50gb second >50gb third 20gb fourth 60gb firth 30gb that the largest would then >be the size of the smallest disk, not 80 or 100 or 120 for that matter >or am I wrong here? Well, wrt to R5, yes. If the array is spanned across different disks, it must use the smallest size and leave unused space for the remainder on the larger disks.. jlc _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: OT Question about raid 5
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "'CentOS mailing list'" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: OT Question about raid 5
- From: "Joseph L. Casale" <JCasale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:23:58 -0600
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20090421190943.28277.2109142044.swift@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <20090421190943.28277.2109142044.swift@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Thread-index: AcnCtNCXbrov5Eu8QEe1tAqmYit/dgAAanlQ
- Thread-topic: OT Question about raid 5
- References:
- OT Question about raid 5
- From: Per Qvindesland
- OT Question about raid 5
- Prev by Date: OT Question about raid 5
- Next by Date: Re: OT Question about raid 5
- Previous by thread: OT Question about raid 5
- Next by thread: Re: OT Question about raid 5
- Index(es):
 |