Re: 5.3 and XFS (fwd)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Ross Walker wrote:

> Time to format isn't really an issue as it is done once before being
> put into production. The biggest concern is processing performance and
> time to fsck as well as data integrity and recoverability.

Listen, when you're talking a multi TB or PB file system it *is* an issue 
I assure you.  With disk sizes growing like they are it is only going to 
get worse.  This is a concern for a great many of us.

> Besides XFS allocates inodes on the fly, that's why it's so fast
> formatting, but why ext4 is a little faster processing.

EXT4 is in a few edge cases faster due to this, but XFS is still very fast 
in almost all other scenarios despite this.

-- 
James A. Peltier
Systems Analyst (FASNet), VIVARIUM Technical Director
Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus
Phone   : 778-782-6573
Fax     : 778-782-3045
E-Mail  : jpeltier@xxxxxx
Website : http://www.fas.sfu.ca | http://vivarium.cs.sfu.ca
           http://blogs.sfu.ca/people/jpeltier
MSN     : subatomic_spam@xxxxxxxxxxx

The point of the HPC scheduler is to
keep everyone equally unhappy.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux