Doesn't look like my reply hit the list for some reason.
--
James A. Peltier
Systems Analyst (FASNet), VIVARIUM Technical Director
Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus
Phone : 778-782-6573
Fax : 778-782-3045
E-Mail : jpeltier@xxxxxx
Website : http://www.fas.sfu.ca | http://vivarium.cs.sfu.ca
http://blogs.sfu.ca/people/jpeltier
MSN : subatomic_spam@xxxxxxxxxxx
The point of the HPC scheduler is to
keep everyone equally unhappy.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:35:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: James A. Peltier <jpeltier@xxxxxxxxx>
To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 5.3 and XFS
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Ross Walker wrote:
> I think it's worth while to keep xfs updated for a while until ext4
> has made enough of an in-road to say xfs should be depreciated in
> favor of ext4.
>
> -Ross
Considering that it still takes several minutes to format a partition with EXT4
vs the couple of seconds for XFS, I don't see XFS depricated *any* time soon.
--
James A. Peltier
Systems Analyst (FASNet), VIVARIUM Technical Director
Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus
Phone : 778-782-6573
Fax : 778-782-3045
E-Mail : jpeltier@xxxxxx
Website : http://www.fas.sfu.ca | http://vivarium.cs.sfu.ca
http://blogs.sfu.ca/people/jpeltier
MSN : subatomic_spam@xxxxxxxxxxx
The point of the HPC scheduler is to
keep everyone equally unhappy.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
