On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Alessandro Ren wrote:
> Qmail is fantastic, have sued for years, but for workgroup,
> calendaring feaures, Zimbra is the way.
>
I have decided to give SME a go. It provides Qmail on Centos 4.7, with
Centos 5.2 in beta.
I chose SME because I also have to replace an NT server here as well, so
it makes a good fit.
I have a test system working and building the mailserver replacement
system now. Then I will build the NT server replacement.
> []s.
>
> On 3/17/2009 7:30 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
>
>> Am 17.03.2009 um 21:19 schrieb Per Qvindesland:
>>
>>
>>
>>> No as I said it does not have all the synchronizing stuff but rock
>>> solid
>>> email server, sadly Zimbra in my humble opinion not really free, but
>>> of
>>> course there is http://www.opengroupware.org/ http://www.citadel.org/
>>> http://www.open-xchange.com/EN/developer/index.html and http://kolab.org
>>> to
>>> mention a few all with their own pro's and con's
>>>
>>>
>> All the "free" solutions depend on you spending an extra-ordinary
>> amount of time configuring them.
>>
>> The amount of QA needed to pull something like Zimbra off is
>> staggering (sometimes it's still not enough QA....)
>>
>> My own mail is qmail-only - I gave-up trying to get all the
>> calendaring-packages running long ago.
>> But at work, we have Zimbra and is is really cool IMO.
>> It has a slick web-interface, it sync's with Outlook, Mac - and then
>> there is this great/horrible fat client called Zimbra Desktop...
>> ;-)
>>
>>
>> I have to admit, though, that the list-price for a small amount of
>> mailboxes looks not so cheap (esp. if you want Zimbra Mobile).
>> (How many mailboxes does the original author want to replace, actually?)
>>
>> But still, I'm kind of fascinated by it - mostly, because it's very
>> openly developed and by browsing through their bugzilla and P4
>> repository-webinterface, you get a good idea of what current issues
>> there are, what would get fixed by going to a newer version (and which
>> new bugs to expect).
>> I wish every vendor did that.
>>
>> We run it on CentOS, BTW (test/dev environment via Virtuozzo,
>> production on physical hardware).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Rainer
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
