Alessandro Ren wrote: > Qmail is fantastic, have sued for years, but for workgroup, > calendaring feaures, Zimbra is the way. > I have decided to give SME a go. It provides Qmail on Centos 4.7, with Centos 5.2 in beta. I chose SME because I also have to replace an NT server here as well, so it makes a good fit. I have a test system working and building the mailserver replacement system now. Then I will build the NT server replacement. > []s. > > On 3/17/2009 7:30 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote: > >> Am 17.03.2009 um 21:19 schrieb Per Qvindesland: >> >> >> >>> No as I said it does not have all the synchronizing stuff but rock >>> solid >>> email server, sadly Zimbra in my humble opinion not really free, but >>> of >>> course there is http://www.opengroupware.org/ http://www.citadel.org/ >>> http://www.open-xchange.com/EN/developer/index.html and http://kolab.org >>> to >>> mention a few all with their own pro's and con's >>> >>> >> All the "free" solutions depend on you spending an extra-ordinary >> amount of time configuring them. >> >> The amount of QA needed to pull something like Zimbra off is >> staggering (sometimes it's still not enough QA....) >> >> My own mail is qmail-only - I gave-up trying to get all the >> calendaring-packages running long ago. >> But at work, we have Zimbra and is is really cool IMO. >> It has a slick web-interface, it sync's with Outlook, Mac - and then >> there is this great/horrible fat client called Zimbra Desktop... >> ;-) >> >> >> I have to admit, though, that the list-price for a small amount of >> mailboxes looks not so cheap (esp. if you want Zimbra Mobile). >> (How many mailboxes does the original author want to replace, actually?) >> >> But still, I'm kind of fascinated by it - mostly, because it's very >> openly developed and by browsing through their bugzilla and P4 >> repository-webinterface, you get a good idea of what current issues >> there are, what would get fixed by going to a newer version (and which >> new bugs to expect). >> I wish every vendor did that. >> >> We run it on CentOS, BTW (test/dev environment via Virtuozzo, >> production on physical hardware). >> >> >> >> >> Rainer >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> >> > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos