LifeKeeper vs RH/CentOS Cluster

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Hello All:

I've configured a few instances of RedHat/CentOS clustering. For basic
services such as web, dns, and LDAP it seems to work well. My basic
configuration just uses the core services and a DRBD volume for the
shared storage.

We have some existing LifeKeeper clustered systems. I don't know much
about them except that they use a similar hearbeat/shared storage
solution.  Has anyone here used both and can mention some pros/cons of
each? In particular, is there anything that LifeKeeper provides that
cannot be replicated via the RedHat/CentOS solution?

Thanks all for any input.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux