On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 08:43 -0600, rray_1@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Feb 2009, William L. Maltby wrote:
>
> <snip>
> I didn't mean to stir up a ruckus
Not your fault at all. I know that Dag often monitors this list and on
occasions when he can't/doesn't get stuff resolved at the rpmforge
site/list, he'll generously help out right from this list.
But he has posted at rpmforge list about how swamped he is. Logic would
indicate that a faster response might be had there. My assumption was
that you either didn't know about his mailing list or forgot about it.
So I just wanted to suggest it to you. I seldom (never?) intend to be
condescending or harsh in my posts (resist the urge, resist the
urge, ... oh well, the hell with it: unlike some others ;-)
Unfortunately, the desire for brevity on lists often allows a lot of
latitude for interpreting posts as harsh.
The ruckus came when some folks apparently interpreted your post
differently than I and decided that I deserved castigation.
Their problem, not mine.
> Thanks for the help
I do hope that my original reply was seen as intended - helpful.
> <snip>
--
Bill
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
