Re: rpmforge

[rray_1@xxxxxxxxxxx]

On Sat, 7 Feb 2009, William L. Maltby wrote:

>
> On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 08:00 -0500, William L. Maltby wrote:
>> On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 17:39 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
>>> William L. Maltby wrote:
>>>> You'll probably get a better response, as well as a fix if there is a
>>>> problem, by posting to that list rather than here.
>>>>
>>>
>>> you mean the list you can't find since the rpmforge website is
>>> apparently down?
>>
>> See my other reply.
>
> I see that _your_ post to rpmforge's list got through ok and the web
> site was apparently not fixed at that time, based on Dag's subsequent
> post.
>
> Now, since this is a CentOS list and the mailing lists for rpmforge were
> apparently working, what is wrong with suggesting that the user post
> there?
>
> You and Brian both seem to have the same problem with my short reply to
> the OP. What specifically is your beef with my suggestion, which was not
> critical, combative or offensive in any way that I can see.
>
>> <snip>
>
>

I didn't mean to stir up a ruckus
Thanks for the help
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos