On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Vandaman wrote:
> There are security updates upstream for CentOS (4 and 5)
> and it looks like the CentOS 5 ones have been rebuilt
> and rolled out. How come the CentOS 4 branch lags behind,
> or are the CentOS 5 devs different from the CentOS 4 devs?
> If more volunteers are needed I'm sure assistance could
> be offered by the CentOS community.
'Vandaman' --
You hold no @centos.org, nor role beyond mailing list
participant. A non-enumerated list is worse than useless, as
it falsely causes concern. So near as I can tell (and I read
ALL bug filings, centdor-sec, and a daily custom locally
produced report of all upstream produced updates), you do NOT
file bugs in the bug tracker to make formal your concern.
You talk, just to make noise.
Some updates in question just showed up today. A couple on
the 8th
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0020.html
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0001.html
and a clutch on the 7th
Just WHAT do you have in mind?
How about you NOT overstep your role? -- Your self-appointed
presence as monitor in this list, and of the project are
tiresome, not official, and frankly not helpful. You hide
behind a throwaway email provider.
How about just NOT popping off with whatever little thought
wanders into your head for two days running?
-- Russ herrold
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
