non-restraint; was: CentOS 4 update backlog

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Vandaman wrote:

> There are security updates upstream for CentOS (4 and 5)
> and it looks like the CentOS 5 ones have been rebuilt
> and rolled out. How come the CentOS 4 branch lags behind,
> or are the CentOS 5 devs different from the CentOS 4 devs?

> If more volunteers are needed I'm sure assistance could
> be offered by the CentOS community.

'Vandaman' --

You hold no @centos.org, nor role beyond mailing list 
participant.  A non-enumerated list is worse than useless, as 
it falsely causes concern.  So near as I can tell (and I read 
ALL bug filings, centdor-sec, and a daily custom locally 
produced report of all upstream produced updates), you do NOT 
file bugs in the bug tracker to make formal your concern. 
You talk, just to make noise.

Some updates in question just showed up today.  A couple on 
the 8th
 	https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0020.html
 	https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0001.html
and a clutch on the 7th

Just WHAT do you have in mind?

How about you NOT overstep your role? -- Your self-appointed 
presence as monitor in this list, and of the project are 
tiresome, not official, and frankly not helpful.  You hide 
behind a throwaway email provider.

How about just NOT popping off with whatever little thought 
wanders into your head for two days running?

-- Russ herrold
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux