On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 13:37 +0000, Karanbir Singh wrote: > Rainer Duffner wrote: > > On a small scale, running VMware ESX3i or VMware-server is perfectly > > possible. > There seems to be a lot of fanboy affinity around ESXi - No, the hypervisor in a virtualized environment is an absolutely critical component; there is no room at all for fanboys. VMware is a well established solution [+50% customer satisfaction, Citrix at ~30%; and +50% vs. ~20% marketshare. VMware is the only virtualization solution to have increased its market share in the last year.] With something this central do an organizations architecture it pays to be risk-averse; and migrating between solutions is a miserable experience. > and with the > fact that its 'available' off the shelf, zero cost up front. however to > make it do anything you still need to buy into vmware tools. This statement is false; I have several stand-alone ESXi boxes running. There are no commercial products required for a working setup; the commercial components provide motion, consolidated backed and the centralized management console [which is crap anyway]. > I dont see > how that is a lot more of a technology lockdown than Xen or KVM. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos