Re: Sendmail and pmtu discovery

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Tue, October 14, 2008 12:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Ralph Angenendt wrote on Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:24:08 +0200:
>
>> If you don't know the smallest MTU on the path to the mail server, you
>> might not be able to send packets over that path, especially if DF is
>> set.
>
> But if it's not set? Shouldn't most devices have it not set?

Yes, most devices should fragment if necessary (DF not set).

Most devices should also pass/accept ICMP messages relating to their
connections.  Deliberately configuring them not to is asking for trouble;
those messages are part of the protocol for a reason.

(Fragmentation introduces more work and effectively many more lost packets
in most setups, so the flow will be jumpy and less efficient even if it
mostly works.)

-- 
David Dyer-Bennet, dd-b@xxxxxxxx; http://dd-b.net/
Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/data/
Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/
Dragaera: http://dragaera.info

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux