Andrew Norris wrote: > Back to the PTR RR: > > $ dig +short MX bobhoffman.com > 10 mail.bobhoffman.com. > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > $ dig +short A mail.bobhoffman.com > 72.35.68.59 > $ dig +short -x 72.35.68.59 > bobhoffman.com. > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > mail.bobhoffman.com != bobhoffman.com So why should the MX for a domain have the same name as the mailout for a domain has? And the name/ip of the mailout is what the receiving side sees. > This may not be your main problem, but it certainly isn't helping > matters. Yahoo seems to be pretty picky on reverse DNS. I had a VPS > running a mail server where the PTR matched the host. I was relegated > to yahoo's spam folder until changed from the default PTR which looked > mildly like a dialup. That's something different (and still bad, but Yahoo is one of the gorillas who can decide not to follow RFCs when receiving mails). But scoring mails down because you don't like the hostname the PTR points to is plain bad and stupid. At least they don't reject those mails. I'd still like to see logs or headers of mails which have been put into spam quarantine, because ALL people do here is GUESS what could go wrong and give advice which makes my toe nails curl up. As long as he is adhering to RFCs it's not him doing something wrong, it's Yahoo doing something wrong. But to know that some evidence is needed. Ralph
Attachment:
pgpzAhejWT4MG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
