RE: kickstart problems

["Joseph L. Casale" <JCasale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>I've /never/ seen RHEL/CentOS or any of its predecessors renumber
>ethernet ports on a working system..

Yeah, I have never seen it "re"number either?

>I've seen it number them
>backwards, such that eth0 was the port labeled '1' outside the chassis
>and eth1 was port '0', but it was extremely consistent about this (one
>specific case of this I remember is  RHEL2.1 or 3 on a Intel SE7501WV2
>dual xeon board).   I've had a pile of different RH linux configurations
>running on various servers for 10 or more years.

Here is a good explanation about this:

http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?lang=en&cc=us&taskId=115&prodSeriesId=254896&prodTypeId=15351&objectID=c01430330

jlc
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos