on 8-22-2008 7:01 AM David Hrbáč spake the following:
Static routes work fine, but having 2 default routes will not be easy in linux. You can't be sure that packets can find there way back to their origin. Yours seems to work for you, but I bet it is because the packets are luckily getting back. It usually fails miserably.Rob Townley napsal(a):Are you sure this is actually processed? Do you have a working example for CentOS 4.x or 5.x? One that works with two NICS that would use two different gateways to the internet? I would like nothing more to get this to work in a streamlined fashion. i didn't have success with the /etc/sysconfig/static-routes file, but maybe i didn't specify the routes using the correct syntax?Well, I use on one of my routers in /etc/sysconfig/static-routes: any net 192.168.36.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 192.168.38.254 any net 192.168.37.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 192.168.38.253 Running C4.6, route: [root@arakis ~]# route -n Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 212.47.23.188 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.252 U 0 0 0 eth0 192.168.38.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 192.168.36.0 192.168.38.254 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1 192.168.37.0 192.168.38.253 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1 0.0.0.0 212.47.23.189 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 David Hrbáč
-- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
