On Sun, 2008-07-06 at 23:46 -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >If it won't "wok", you'l have to "cook" up something. :-) YUK, YUK! > > Now that's ironic (you'l):P Yeah, but not as good since it doesn't lend itself easily to "punning". > <snip sig stuff> -- Bill _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
- From: "William L. Maltby" <CentOS4Bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 05:55:16 -0400
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <49627735003F5C479100225C339F9FE06FE2B63280@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <49627735003F5C479100225C339F9FE06FE2B63273@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200807051750.54828.tony.molloy@xxxxx> <49627735003F5C479100225C339F9FE06FE2B63275@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200807060652.43981.tony.molloy@xxxxx> <1215340790.5681.11.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49627735003F5C479100225C339F9FE06FE2B63280@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References:
- CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
- From: Joseph L. Casale
- Re: CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
- From: Tony Molloy
- RE: CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
- From: Joseph L. Casale
- Re: CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
- From: Tony Molloy
- Re: CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
- From: William L. Maltby
- RE: CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
- From: Joseph L. Casale
- CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
- Prev by Date: "installation method" (CentOS 5.2)
- Next by Date: Flaky desktop audio behavior.
- Previous by thread: RE: CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
- Next by thread: i386 version of Perl getting installed on x64 system?
- Index(es):
 |