>I had no trouble copying it or linking it. Yes, but how does that satisfy yum? jlc
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "'CentOS mailing list'" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
- From: "Joseph L. Casale" <JCasale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 22:07:38 -0600
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <200807051750.54828.tony.molloy@xxxxx>
- References: <49627735003F5C479100225C339F9FE06FE2B63273@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <486F9777.7080906@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <200807051750.54828.tony.molloy@xxxxx>
- Thread-index: Acjev1ENmL0njqBXScCB/7UmeJ0bvQAXnDmA
- Thread-topic: CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
- From: Tony Molloy
- Re: CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
- References:
- CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
- From: Joseph L. Casale
- Re: CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
- From: Jay Leafey
- Re: CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
- From: Tony Molloy
- CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
- Prev by Date: Re: Back to my Xwindows kernel panic
- Next by Date: i386 version of Perl getting installed on x64 system?
- Previous by thread: Re: CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
- Next by thread: Re: CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
- Index(es):
 |