>Why don't you try it and see what happens. I did, which is what lead me to believe it only checks the db:) jlc
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
- From: "Joseph L. Casale" <JCasale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2008 00:20:33 -0600
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <200807060652.43981.tony.molloy@xxxxx>
- References: <49627735003F5C479100225C339F9FE06FE2B63273@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200807051750.54828.tony.molloy@xxxxx> <49627735003F5C479100225C339F9FE06FE2B63275@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200807060652.43981.tony.molloy@xxxxx>
- Thread-index: AcjfLJhu2JZyp+BZQEiKwLff7wRQQwAA6yAA
- Thread-topic: CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
- From: Tony Molloy
- Re: CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
- References:
- CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
- From: Joseph L. Casale
- Re: CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
- From: Tony Molloy
- RE: CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
- From: Joseph L. Casale
- Re: CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
- From: Tony Molloy
- CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
- Prev by Date: Re: CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
- Next by Date: Re: CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
- Previous by thread: Re: CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
- Next by thread: Re: CentOS 5.2 Missing Dependancy
- Index(es):
 |