On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
My HDs are not using UFS they're on Ext2
What does that mean, I'm not a native speaker so I didn't follow that, sorry.
Didn't want to ofend or even make mistakes, my only point its that freenas could do the job under a SMB enviroment.
And I don't even compare CentOS between FreeNAS in anything.
Victor Padro wrote:I would therefore pass on freenas, purely on that one point.
> isnt freenas also unionfs ?
>
> Yes it is.
My HDs are not using UFS they're on Ext2
Also, conder trimming your posts please
What does that mean, I'm not a native speaker so I didn't follow that, sorry.
Didn't want to ofend or even make mistakes, my only point its that freenas could do the job under a SMB enviroment.
And I don't even compare CentOS between FreeNAS in anything.
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
--
"It is human nature to think wisely and act in an absurd fashion."
"Todo el desorden del mundo proviene de las profesiones mal o mediocremente servidas"
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
