Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> > If they manage to port all the Fedora extras over for EL then I
> > would say that is pretty darn close to one-stop shop for RPMs. Of
> > course no repo can have it all. There are always the questionable
> > items like closed source drivers and codecs which should be isolated.
>
> Ross, you are obviously interested in the flames more than anything
> else, and as Rex already pointed out in a hintting kind of way, lots of
> us are no longer interested in that.
Then why are you still talking?
> You need to go back and workout what a real resourceful repo should /
> could / would have. If EPEL gives you all that, your' done. For a vast
> majority of the rest of us, it doesnt and the way their mandate works,
> it wont.
This is a CentOS users list. It is for users of CentOS to FREELY voice
their opinions on and about CentOS. If you don't like my opinion, fine,
but you have no right to tell me I am wrong.
-Ross
______________________________________________________________________
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by
the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged
and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient
of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto,
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the
original and any copy or printout thereof.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
