Frank Cox wrote: > Unless I've missed something (which is possible) there hasn't been any "public > progress announcements" regarding rpmfusion in the past several weeks. > > Is there anything new to report? My ulterior motive is that I would love to > have the convenience of a one-stop rpm shop for Centos/RHEL and Fedora, and > it's my understanding that's what rpmfusion is intended to be... Not to start a repo flame war, but for CentOS/RHEL, the repo that aims to be a one-stop rpm shop is EPEL. Of course it needs more contributors, but it has already ported a significant amount of FC6's old 'extras' repo over (FC6 <-> EL5). I suspect that EL6 will be equivalent to F8 as F9 has just way too many new technologies that will take 2 years or more to settle down to stable technologies. -Ross ______________________________________________________________________ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos