Jay Leafey wrote:
> Another alternative that we are examining is using OCFS2 (Oracle Cluster
> File System 2) and iSCSI for the shared storage with Heartbeat for
> service management. This combination looks to be a bit "lighter" than
> the Cluster Suite and GFS, but I'm hoping to confirm or disprove that
> impression this summer in my "copious free time".
ocfs isnt really worth spending time on anymore. iirc, even oracle no
longer support an ocfs/ocfs2 based backend store.
might as well consider gpfs ( the cost per machine isnt that high, and
there is reasonable assurances that it would work ).
/me is still thrashing out gfs2 though, and conga! and clusterlvm!
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
