Re: COBOL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wed, 21 May 2008 15:12:58 -0400
"William L. Maltby" <CentOS4Bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> If MF COBOL is still available, might be worth a look. It was very good
> then. Should be very good now if still around. It was *very* compatible
> with the IBM flavor(s).

I vaguely recall reading that there is some kind of a licensing "gotcha" in
later versions of MicroFocus Cobol that apparently was not present in earlier
versions.

Anyone considering a MF Cobol installation may want to research the licensing
situation carefully.  I don't remember any specifics about it at all, other
than what I have written above.  It may have been resolved, or it may not have
existed in the first place and be simply someone's misunderstanding of the
situation.  But it's worth checking out.

-- 
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux