Re: clustered mail server?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Christopher Chan wrote:

Sorry, I did not read your mail through properly. Not mounted on the secondary, okay. Anyway, quite a fair bit off complexity there in making sure the network block device does not get mounted by both boxes at the same time.

Is it really worth the complexity when you can have both servers online running off their own disks for the mail queue without having to worry about the other guy? If the primary is so badly whatever that a queue on mirrored disks cannot be brought back online with a simple reboot, what chances are there that the network block device won't be a victim of the whatever and mess up the queue so that the secondary cannot use it?

That's generally my reasoning in thinking that simple raid1 mirrors on the primary with swappable disks and a spare powered-off chassis are probably more robust. You do need someone on-site capable of swapping the disks if you have a motherboard/power supply failure but with server-class equipment and a good UPS those are pretty rare. You also need additional backups, since an operator or software error could take out your online filesystem including the mirrored side.

--
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux