while it takes a minimum of 6 disks, we've had great luck with RAID 50.
Two separate RAID 5 arrays (fast read, moderate writes) that are then
placed into a RAID 0 (fast read, fast write). you lose 2 drives worth of
space, but lord it's fast and the data is mirrored. Not sure if you can
do the whole thing in software. I use two 3Ware 9650SE cards to do the
RAID 5 and I do RAID 0 in software.
Jason
www.cyborgworkshop.org
John J. Lee wrote:
> I am currently running 7 raid10 data servers. I can say read speed
> increases but I doubt the write speed comparing to non raid setup.
> The main advantage of the raid is redundancy but not
> the performance. If you want to boost the disk performance, go for
> the faster drive with more than
> 10,000rpm spinning speed.
>
> -john
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Miguel Medalha <miguelmedalha@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Have you tried RAID 10? It combines the security of RAID 1 with the speed of
>> RAID 0. dmraid supports this RAID type.
>>
>>
>>
>>> I was wonder what experiences there are out there with using RAID-X for
>>> performance increases. I do use RAID-1 (2 disks) but am interested in
>>> attemtps to gain higher R/W performance. Do the RAID-5's etc give
>> noticeable performace increases?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
