RE: Re: questions on kickstart

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 at 4:32pm, Ross S. W. Walker wrote
> 
> > I think you might be missing a little something in there, like /boot?
> 
> /boot is not required to be its own partition.  In the days of yore, when 
> BIOSes couldn't boot from partitions the crossed the 1024 cylinder 
> barrier, it made sense to have a small /boot as your first partition. 
> These days?  Not so much.

Ah, thanks. I was under the impression that anaconda required
a /boot, like anaconda requires a swap partition which makes it
hard if you want to setup a swapfile instead later during the
install.

I also use LVM for my installs, which I believe needs a /boot
since grub can't as of yet boot off of a LV (and forget it if
that LV's VG is on a MD), so I hadn't seen a kickstart that
didn't have a /boot.

-Ross

______________________________________________________________________
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by
the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged
and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient
of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto,
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the
original and any copy or printout thereof.

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux