On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 13:57 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On 12 March 2008, William L. Maltby CentOS4Bill at triad.rr.com wrote:
> <snip>
> >I just tried again and got the same errors as in my original post. I'll
> >run a verify on my system and see if something got corrupted. I have
> >seen two unreadable sectors from smartctl selftest output in a currently
> >unused portion of one of my HDs. The rpm verify and another smartctl
> >selftest may provide a clue or two.
>
> >I hope no more bad sectors show up. If I see more than just a few I
> >believe things tend over successive self tests, I tend to have a
> >pessimistic outlook for the drive.
>
> Bill: I get the Digest version of the ML each morning, but I read the
> above online. Suggest you download the Diagnostics from the
> manufacturer of the drive and run that. You may be spinning your
> wheels here, and wasting a lot of your valuable time, if the drive is
> bad and needs to be replaced. FWIW, below is the output of the yum
> command you ran, so you can see what I have installed and what I
> don't have installed, of Evolution, on CentOS 5. GL, Lanny
By the time you read this in the A.M. I should have a new smartctl
extended selftest completed. Then I'll get the diags if it seems things
have deteriorated from my comfort level.
Meanwhile, back at the ranch ...
>
>
> [root@dell2400 ~]# yum list 'evo*'
> Loading "installonlyn" plugin
> Loading "priorities" plugin
> Setting up repositories
> adobe-linux-i386 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00
> google 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00
> rpmforge 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00
> base 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00
> updates 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00
> addons 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00
> extras 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00
> Reading repository metadata in from local files
> 239 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
> Installed Packages
> evolution.i386 2.8.0-40.el5_1.1 installed
> evolution-connector.i386 2.8.0-3.fc6 installed
> evolution-data-server.i386 1.8.0-15.el5 installed
> evolution-webcal.i386 2.7.1-6 installed
> Available Packages
> evolution-bogofilter.i386 0.2.0-1.el5.rf rpmforge
> evolution-data-server.i386 1.8.0-25.el5 base
> evolution-data-server-devel.i386 1.8.0-25.el5 base
> evolution-devel.i386 2.8.0-40.el5_1.1 updates
> evolution-rss.i386 0.0.7-1.el5.rf rpmforge
> evolution-sharp.i386 0.14.0.1-1.el5.centos extras
> evolution-sharp-devel.i386 0.14.0.1-1.el5.centos extras
> [root@dell2400 ~]#
Looks just like mine looked. I did go a-googling and found some
possibilities.
None are related to evolution, but I'm hoping that clues lie there for
discovery by some skilled viewers of this thread.
Here, they claim that the oasis site is broken. But since I did a wget
successfully, I still suspect my installation has something wrong. But
rpm --verify doesn't give a clue, more later.
# Wrapped line
http://www.archivum.info/debian-bugs-
dist.lists.debian.org/2004-12/msg07181.html
And in the follow-up to this, they mention the need to have a version of
docbook installed and using --disable-gtk-doc. But this has to do with
building pacakages.
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2005-08/msg00315.html
In the next, broken rpm macros are suggested. It starts here, but I'd
skip to the second URL as it seems to get closer to the germ of truth..
<warning> Site seem to take great glee in presenting lots of "cutesy"
animated little ads that slow things noticeably.
</warning>
The stuff beginning here doesn't *seem* related to my ignorant eyes, but
maybe it does have meaning to others. Mostly petty sniping typical
of ... UH-OH! Almost got politically incorrect there.
http://osdir.com/ml/linux.pld.devel.english/2005-05/msg00095.html
Anyway, my error appears in this one.
http://osdir.com/ml/linux.pld.devel.english/2005-05/msg00106.html
But, I can't see that it relates and no solution jumps out at me.
Here is from another bug tracker at Debian. Maybe some hope there?
# wrapped, from 5/2004, maybe not relevant any longer?
http://www.archivum.info/debian-bugs-
dist.lists.debian.org/2004-12/msg07144.html
It includes a link to here.
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/docbook-tc/200405/msg00000.html
But it's subject is "FYI: OASIS site not ECN standards-compliant" and
leads absolutely nowhere.
So, anyone with time, interest, knowledge, a beer... ?
Hoping the the mention of docbook is relevant...
# yum list doc\*
Loading "changelog" plugin <crewcut>
.
.
extras 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB
00:00
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
Reading repository metadata in from local files
268 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Installed Packages
docbook-dtds.noarch 1.0-30.1
installed
Available Packages
docbook-simple.noarch 1.0-2.1.1 base
docbook-slides.noarch 3.3.1-2.1.1 base
docbook-style-dsssl.noarch 1.79-4.1 base
docbook-style-xsl.noarch 1.69.1-5.1 base
docbook-utils.noarch 0.6.14-5.1 base
docbook-utils-pdf.noarch 0.6.14-5.1 base
docbook2odf.noarch 0.244-2.el5.rf rpmforge
#
Maybe I need to install one of these? One would think that yum would
have recognized this though.
> <snip sig stuff>
TIA for any/all help.
BTW, saw the RH bugzilla entry for the nautilus-sender issue with
pidgin/gaim. Real responsive crew when you don't have a contract, eh? I
bet the promise of having a fix in 5.3 (? how many months from now?) is
not how they jump in when you send them a fix.
--
Bill
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
