Karanbir Singh wrote:
in the case of rsyslog, thats not the case :D I had a play with the 3.x
tree today, and it *looks* ok to me. So might as well inflict it upon
everyone else considering its in the Testing Repo, no sane person will
use it in Production. Right ?
I shall have updated packages in a couple of days, prolly over the
weekend. The package queue is quite long at the moment.
I've got mine working finally, but I definitely look forward
to seeing v3 in your testing repo! Let me know if I can help
in any way.
Basically, I want to be able to log locally AND remotely. AFAICT, I
have to move to v3 to get this feature.
err, really ? you could do that with conventional syslog too.
Yes, strange but correct. Still, rsyslog gives me other
features over conventional syslog, not the least of which
you mention yourself:
also, running over tcp is nicer, since you atleast now get a chance to
do something about bits that dont make it.
... that, and it also allows me to run over stunnel.
Thanks again,
johnn
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
