On Friday 29 February 2008, Hoy, Mark wrote: > I just noticed that a couple of the updated RPMS have incorrect md5sums > compared to the original email. I can't comment on this. > This exists on at least two mirrors: > http://centos.take2hosting.com/5.1/updates/i386/RPMS/ > http://altruistic.lbl.gov/mirrors/centos/5.1/updates/i386/RPMS/ > > # md5sum perl-* > 7a3f9c4f7c35c23a0751f2b9fc196a21 perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2.i386.rpm > 135fb1abc0f83fc85885b286ad268a7c > perl-suidperl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2.i386.rpm > > Is there a list of the md5sums for the entire updates directory? Even better, rpms have integrated checksums and signatures: $ rpm --checksig perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2.i386.rpm perl-5.8.8-10.el5_0.2.i386.rpm: (sha1) dsa sha1 md5 gpg OK /Peter > Suggestions welcome.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
