Benjamin Smith wrote: > Can anybody explain to me what's going on here? This is a CentOS 4 i386 > system. > > [root@edison ~]# rm -f /etc/prelink.cache > [root@edison ~]# /etc/cron.daily/prelink > [root@edison ~]# rpm -qf /usr/bin/sqlite3 > sqlite-3.3.6-2 > [root@edison ~]# rpm --verify sqlite > prelink: /usr/bin/sqlite3: at least one of file's dependencies has changed > since prelinking > S.?..... /usr/bin/sqlite3 > [root@edison ~]# rpm -q --dump sqlite | grep "bin/sqlite3" > /usr/bin/sqlite3 29044 1178360479 70e7158185e01e23dd2a62fa00f0f752 0100755 > root root 0 0 0 X > [root@edison ~]# md5sum /usr/bin/sqlite3 > 6e4b1dc7b0b5ade26448ed700c33e05f /usr/bin/sqlite3 > [root@edison ~]# prelink -u /usr/bin/sqlite3 > [root@edison ~]# md5sum /usr/bin/sqlite3 > 70e7158185e01e23dd2a62fa00f0f752 /usr/bin/sqlite3 > [root@edison ~]# rpm --verify sqlite > [root@edison ~]# prelink -f /usr/bin/sqlite3 > prelink: /usr/lib/libncurses.so.5.4: .debug_loc adjusting unfinished > [root@edison etc]# md5sum /usr/bin/sqlite3 > 70e7158185e01e23dd2a62fa00f0f752 /usr/bin/sqlite3 > [root@edison etc]# > > How did the RPM database have the right values for the sqlite3 file before > prelink was run? Or, another way, why was the file different in the first > place, that running prelink against it fixed it? And if "undoing" the prelink > changed something, why wasn't it "changed back" when I ran prelink against > the sqlite3 file the second time? > > Finding this confusing as H__L. > > I have *alot* of files on this system with this issue - I discovered this > while debugging a problem with MailScanner. And, why do I see similar > behavior on another system that's freshly built? EG: just ran the installer > and "yum update" and see the same issue with a smaller number of files? Ben, I can verify that I see the same thing on centos-4.6 fully updated right now. When running "rpm -Va" I have several (dozen :D) RPMS that show the: "at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking" The good news (or bad news depending on your point of view) is that I also see the same thing on a fully updated RHEL-4.6 AS install. I am currently doing a virgin RHEL-4.6 install from the ISOs to see if it happens with the base 4.6 or only after updates. I will post when I know more. Thanks, Johnny Hughes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
