Christopher Chan wrote:
Heitor A. M. Cardozo wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Heitor A. M. Cardozo wrote:
Hi,
A draft with results of my benchmark based on fsbench is available
in http://www.htiweb.inf.br/benchmark/fsbench.htm.
The methodology and the conclusion i will publish later, however,
it shows that the XFS obtained better performance and EXT3 had
results that can now compete in this environment.
Thank you very much Heitor. May I trouble you to publish the files
that fsbench outputs or at least the summary files?
Ok Christopher, now the tests are available for download on site.
Any suggestions you may have to improve this benchmark are much
appreciated.
Well...creating graphs like the ones Bruce made would be nice...
I am writing an awk script to pull out the averages from the summary
file. I already have the reader times done, all I need to do is get
the averages for the writers and then calculate the deliveries per
second for the different number of writers being invoked.
I agree and thank you if send me the average values or even the graphs.
Any suggestions to publish the results? wiki.centos.org?
One thing that I do have in mind due to curiosity is what ext3j would
look like...
Ok, I added the log for ext3j in file log.tar.gz available on site.
Heitor A. M. Cardozo
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
