Re: Filesystem for Maildir

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Heitor Augusto M Cardozo wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
Heitor Augusto M Cardozo wrote:
Hi all,

In last year, i had made some research and benchmarks based on CentOS 4 to know which filesystem is better for Maildir: ReiserFS, XFS or EXT3.

My conclusion was as follows:

- EXT3: reliable but very slow to read many small files.
- ReiserFS: best performance but unreliable and bad recovery tools.
- XFS: My choice, good performance and reliability.

I would contest the last two.

I had two bad experiences with ReiserFS in our Mail Server, reiserfsck is too slow and lost data.

Well, not on that...reiserfs assumes perfect media according to the complaints of some who use reiser so bad blocks could cause even the entire loss of the filesystem...not to mention that RH and therefore Centos (I wonder about plus...) does not support/maintain reiserfs.


IMHO ReiserFS have the best performance for Maildir but its only safe on production if you´re sure that the system I/O will never fail.

What does fsbench say? It has the best writing performance too?!?


On CentOS 5.0, a had the same benchmarks and now, EXT3 and XFS seems to had better or equivalent performance on Read and Create Random files. One of this tests, using bonnie++, show this:

# bonnie++ -d /mnt/sdc1/testfile -s 8192 -m `hostname` -n 50:150000:5000:1000

bonnie++? Not appropriate. Try this: http://untroubled.org/benchmarking/2004-04/

And add JFS to the mix. You will be surprised.

I already done tests with fsbench and the results on CentOS 4.5 were equivalent: the performance of XFS was much higher than EXT3.

Then, i retest using fsbench, bonnie++ and iozone on CentOS 5.0, and the results now show the EXT3 (dir_index, noatime) with performance similar to XFS.

Now that is very interesting.


What i want to know is: Anyone use or recommend EXT3 for Maildir?

If you do not have full blown battery back for write caches yes.


My configuration: 3Ware 9650SE-8LPML, 8 drives SATA2 ST3500630AS 500GB on RAID 10.


Add BBU and XFS or JFS should do.
Yes, the BBU is installed and write_cache is enable. I will test JFS to compare.

Thanks for your help.

Please post your findings. :-)

Christopher
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux