Re: Disk De-Fraging in Linux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Brian Mathis wrote:
On 9/20/07, gjgowey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <gjgowey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That or run buzzsaw (win)  which is a continuous defragmenter (well,
when the system is idle that is) that runs in the background and only
costs $10.  Pagedefrag from sysinternals doesn't hurt either (and it's free
off ms' website).  And no, I'm not affiliated with either I just like the
products.

Geoff

On 9/21/07, William Warren <hescominsoon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
IME defragging is highly needed in busy servers that use a lot of disk.
  Every single one of my clients have seen server performance tank when
fragmentation goes over 15% or so..including the workstations.  In vista
it's still necessary.


Last I checked, CentOS was Linux?

thank you. I'm glad someone said it cause I was starting to wonder what list I was reading.

In answer to "what's the difference between NTFS and ext2/3?" Friggin night and day brother! Night and DAY. But I digress. I think what is needed here is a tried and true RTFM. That is the response I was expecting would find it's way into this thread, but I've not yet seen it. Maybe further down the thread perhaps. :)

--
Mark

"If you have found a very wise man, then you've found
a man that at one time was an idiot and lived long enough
to learn from his own stupidity."
==============================================
Powered by CentOS4 (RHEL4)
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux